SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeff Fox who wrote (73359)2/10/1999 6:37:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
<My modem already compresses the data to about 2x on average. Are you implying that with a PIII on my end that this will improve? How much?>

Who knows? Perhaps what the guy meant was a 2x to 10x compression over no compression at all.

By the way, modem compression is lossless (it better be!), which doesn't achieve the same compression ratios as lossy.

<But note that images are already highly compress with Jpeg format, clips with .rm and audio with MP3, so there is likely little left here too.>

I don't think they're talking about all Internet traffic. I think they are talking about real-time video and audio. With processing power, you can take a person's voice or camera video in real-time, compress it, then send it down the wires (or wireless medium) to the other end where the data stream is decoded. Currently, with MP3, RealMedia, I think you have to pre-record the audio or video, then compress the recorded data. This methods of compression itself is too slow to be accomplished in real-time.

But Intel is saying the Pentium III enables methods of real-time video compression, allowing for smoother video-conferencing. You can bet that technology like this will be incorporated in Intel's own Create-and-Share home video-conferencing package.

I don't know if Intel can extend this to just general data, since all this sort of compression is lossy. Sure, a lot of the stuff we download over the Internet is already compressed, either by Zip, JPEG, or modem, but I'm sure there is still a sizable percentage of traffic that isn't compressed yet, and perhaps Intel will want to focus on that while we all wait for the next leap in bandwidth.

Tenchusatsu



To: Jeff Fox who wrote (73359)2/10/1999 11:39:00 PM
From: Larry Loeb  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jeff,

I'll always defer to you and Paul on engineering matters, however, my interpretation is that the faster the PC, the faster the compression and decompression. This results in faster transmission, even with enhanced bandwidth.

Does this sound credible to you?

Does Paul have a comment?

Larry