SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James R. Barrett who wrote (30634)2/10/1999 7:09:00 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
I'll bet there have been some- does it matter? It would only matter to me if it was 30% or more.



To: James R. Barrett who wrote (30634)2/10/1999 7:15:00 PM
From: E  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
give me strength

It is considered good form to acknowledge it when your discussant has gone to the trouble of answering your question well.

349 us cases in which innocent people convicted in this one study

32 cases: no crime was even committed

23 of those found innocent were executed


Is your interest in a particular 'name,' and not in the execution of those 23 innocent people? or is it possibly in obfuscation? I have provided enough information about that study for you to go to original sources and locate the 23 'names.' While you are looking up the 23 'names' of innocent people who were executed before their innocence was established (no thanks to the 'system,'), look up the 'names,' since you like 'names' so much, of those convicted of murder when no murder had even been convicted! The supposed victim was still alive! Get back to us on this, okay?

[Edit: I am wondering. Once you get the list of 'names,' what difference will it make to you? Will you, like X, not care if innocents are executed? (In X's case, unless they are related to her or unless the percentage of the executed who are innocent exceeds thirty.) That sure makes me into a fool for wasting so much of my day on this matter, doesn't it?]



To: James R. Barrett who wrote (30634)2/10/1999 7:20:00 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
cnn.com

Now here is something of critical importance. I HOPE we can all agree that the teletubbies are just wonderful and that Falwell is off his nut for maligning them. My youngest daughter loves the teletubbies, and it certainly never occurred to me that Tinky-Winky was gay. I mean some people think all of them are gay- in that way you say "Geeez, that is soooooo gay" but I don't say that because I live in a house with a teletubby shrine.