Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James R. Barrett who wrote (30639)	2/10/1999 8:37:00 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Respond to of 108807

Actually the constitutional consideration with that case was reasonable doubt. The prosecuting attorney with holding crucial evidence was illegal. That evidence created a reasonable doubt which should have been strong enough to merit a new trial. Then a new jury would decide again the guilt or innocence in the matter. The personal opinions of the officials involved were irrelevant. They ignored the law and subverted justice and certainly allowed an innocent man to be executed.