Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SFLK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric Fader who wrote (542)	2/10/1999 9:08:00 PM
From: Francois Goelo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1591

Eric, be on your guards, #532 is not a nice post to you... I spoke to an investigator friend of mine tonight. He asked me to copy all their posts and forward them to him for thorough analysis. He believes that they are on very thin legal grounds. Manipulating stocks prices through false information, threats, innuendos, investor harassment, etc... is a Federal offence. Furthermore, he believes that they profit directly or indirectly from shorting the stocks and that can easily be proven by investigating their phone/fax/E-Mail/PM records. So far, they have been lucky, because they bullied troubled Companies and , as a result, nobody sued them. But when they screw up and attack a sound Company with satisfied investors who tell them to shove off, they can't use the "white knight in shinning armor" excuse any more. I will keep everyone posted as events on that new front unfold. Regards, F. Goelo + + +

To: Eric Fader who wrote (542)	2/10/1999 9:14:00 PM
From: Dante Sinferno	Respond to of 1591

<<RBond, I'm perplexed because I don't see anyone "scattering.">> It's called an analogy. Perhaps you'd have understood if I had been posting to you ??? <<Would you like it if a bunch of people showed up and started trashing a stock that YOU owned>> It's happened , although it's becoming rarer and rarer. Now , it depends on just who those people are. << Can we cut out ....and get back to a FACTUAL discussion of SFLK?>> Sure , fact of the matter is , you shoulda heeded my earlier warning. You get the last word , I'm done. rob