Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SFLK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric Fader who wrote (573)	2/11/1999 7:09:00 AM
From: Chris Forte	Respond to of 1591

Eric, all I know is you're a proven commodity to those of us that know you - you're a straight shooter and a good man. If you stopped posting on these boards we'd be the poorer for it. What I don't get is if SFLK is a mirage, then somebody better tell Matchmaker.com who must have signed off on the release. If SFLK is a mirage then someone better tell QVC because they just shipped a bunch of product out the door. If SFLK is a mirage then someone better tell all of us on this board that like and use their product. Personally I don't like who they picked for PR, but their product seems to work. Chris

To: Eric Fader who wrote (573)	2/11/1999 7:14:00 AM
From: Francois Goelo	Respond to of 1591

SFLK SHAREHOLDERS, DON'T BE INTIMIDATED BY LOUD MOUTH SHORTS... The stock is rising in low volume due to the SHORTS BEING SQUEEZED and covering their positions. Hold on your stock and do not sell to benefit them. There is NOTHING WRONG WITH THE COMPANY as they are trying to imply. They have been sniffing around SFLK, the Floydie, Doell, Lucky, RBond, Bear Down of this world for over a month now. Check their PERSONAL PROFILES and you'll see the TRUTH. They probably reported SFLK to the SEC as "SHAREHOLDERS CONCERNED WITH THEIR SHARE VALUE" to better short it. They and other MM's have been shorting since the stock was at $8.00. Now it is rising again, because they are BEING SQUEEZED AND ARE SHORT COVERING". If there was something really wrong with SFLK, you would know by now, because they have look long and hard and found nothing of substance. I believe that THEY ARE ACTING ILLEGALLY BY MANIPULATING SHARES THROUGH LIES, INNUENDOS AND SHAREHOLDER HARASSMENT. I am currently hiring an investigator with a view to bring legal proceedings against them if found appropriate. RUN THEM OFF BY NOT SELLING AND SFLK WILL APPRECIATE. Regards, F. Goelo + + +

To: Eric Fader who wrote (573)	2/11/1999 8:50:00 AM
From: Doug McMillan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1591

Eric, since you know Pluvia, maybe you can see if he has done any research on SFLK. I've looked at some of his posts, and he seems to be more civil than Flodyie.