Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (33568)	2/11/1999 12:24:00 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 67261

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Thought you were leaving? JLA

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (33568)	2/11/1999 4:51:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Since we have gone over this terrain before, I will be brief. You have insisted upon beating the Capone horse, included me in the charge of claiming that all who do not support removal are stupid, and had me as one of the baying hounds. You have insisted upon calling me a "type three Clinton hater", and all along have alternated between civility and a childish sarcasm. In the last couple of days, all pretense of civility disappeared. The very act of speculating that the "truth and justice" squad would "love to have libel laws like that here", to bankrupt the opposition, is slanderous. And you have the gall to complain because I characterized your point as "ludicrous"? Plus, you post irrelevant proof that Singapore does indeed do such things, when that is not the controversial point. Finally, are you actually so foolish as to not know that I was referring to Clinton's options in dealing with his lawsuit, not some poor guy in Singapore? Since you applied the "type three" label to me, of course it is your diagnosis. Weisberg wasn't referring specifically to me, was he? You were not just passing something on FYI. Have you been partying prematurely lately?