Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ETPI-Military Entertainment Enters Civilian Market -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gator who wrote (3491)	2/11/1999 12:22:00 PM
From: Kelly Igou	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4767

I wonder whether the reason for the additional depreciation of assets is due to accelerated or unplanned obsolescence, or whether they overvalued the assets when they were acquired and are re-valuing more realistically? If the latter, wouldn't that would border on unethical or incompetent accounting practices? Any CPAs out there willing to express an opinion?

To: Gator who wrote (3491)	2/11/1999 2:50:00 PM
From: Toby Zidle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4767

Looks like they had to depreciate equipment more than they had planned during the first couple of quarterly filings. Assets dropped substantially from previous quarter's report. Gator, this doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Assets don't suddenly go on a depreciation binge. There are depreciation schedules. If you buy restaurant equipment, for example, with a four-year life, it depreciates 25% each year (or some variation if you schedule accelerated depreciation). The point is years in advance you know each year's depreciation. This is not something that catches you by surprise. Elements that would catch the company by surprise might be things lie this ($numbers are hypothetical): -- The company buys equipment for $10 million and books it for $10 million, but actually it's old and out-of-date. Value can't be justified and auditors force a writedown. -- The company buys another company and transfers assets to their books at value claimed by the other company. The equipment turns out to be trash. Auditors force a writedown. -- The company pays top dollar for great equipment, but it doesn't fit into company operations (e.g., computers that can't be networked). Company has to sell equipment for 25 cents on the dollar. -- The company closes a location (Arlington mall, perhaps) and can't use the equipment elsewhere. Storage costs a fortune, so they dispose of equipment at fire sale prices. All of these situations cause unexpected writedowns of assets and loss of stockholder equity. The issue is whether well managed companies get hit with these things so suddenly. Considering how late the financial reports are, I suspect there must have been a lot of 'discussion' of these issues between the ETPI financial staff and the auditors. The auditors, as they always do, won and we see that in the 10K. Does this give you confidence that ETPI is a well managed company?