SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Fairmile Gold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Stakiw who wrote (3874)2/11/1999 1:34:00 PM
From: norm roberts  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4057
 
hey steve,you must admit the frustration on this thread,is directed mainly at the incompetance of the directors in the way this company has been run, so i guess it wrangles alot of share holders,when you get remark's from even joe kizis, about the high payed past and present.INCOMPETANT.directors. that have brought this concern.to its very knees.as a dilution of 5-1 is not in the average shareholders interests. but mainly for insiders to benifit, by bringing there hundreds of thousands, of shares.to around the 15cents mark were they can still get out without. a loss.please explain the word competance to joe when you talk to him next.thanks nrr



To: Steve Stakiw who wrote (3874)2/11/1999 10:57:00 PM
From: Douglas Simpson  Respond to of 4057
 
SCAM SCAM SCAM

JOe what do you think your doing?

Do you think you can clean up the image of this company with just one post?

I dont think so.

You need to hire a PR man like Roman De Guzman or Saul.







To: Steve Stakiw who wrote (3874)2/12/1999 7:36:00 AM
From: Douglas Simpson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4057
 
Steve

If there is a roll back of 5 - 1 would it mean the price of .16 cents for the options granted to the directors changes, or not?

Yes or no question.