SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Currencies and the Global Capital Markets -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (1240)2/11/1999 4:27:00 PM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3536
 
forbes.com

We're All Keynesians — Still?

By Steve H. Hanke

YOU WOULD THINK that the
economic booms brought on by Margaret
Thatcher and Ronald Reagan would have killed
Keynesianism. They abandoned fiscal fine-tuning
in favor of smaller government, less regulation
and flatter taxes, and for their efforts they got
economic booms.

And yet Keynesianism is not dead. It lives on in
the moribund economy of Japan and the
bankrupt policies our Treasury Department is
foisting on Japan.

Like it or not, John Maynard Keynes will go
down as one of the 20th century's most powerful
economists. His 1936 classic, The General
Theory of Employment, Interest and Money,
popularized fiscal fine-tuning—the notion that
more government spending, less taxing or some
combination of the two will cause an economy to
accelerate by a multiple of the stimulus. And that
a fiscal contraction will slow things down. A
touch on the fiscal tiller is supposedly all that is
needed to adjust demand so that it just matches
an economy's capacity to produce.

It was a neat theory, and it captivated two
generations of economists, especially those who
rather liked the idea of a strong central
government. Even Richard Nixon, who claimed
not to be a fan of big government, was moved to
say, "We are all Keynesians now."

And then Margaret Thatcher came along. In
1981, when she was prime minister, Britain's
fiscal deficit was relatively large, 5.6% of gross
domestic product, and the economy was in the
middle of a nasty slump. To restart the economy,
Thatcher instituted a fierce fiscal squeeze,
coupled with an expansionary monetary policy.
This was immediately condemned by 364
dyed-in-the-wool Keynesian economists. In a
letter to the Times of London, they wrote,
"Present policies will deepen the depression,
erode the industrial base of our economy and
threaten its social and political stability."

Thatcher was quickly vindicated. No sooner had
the 364 affixed their signatures than the economy
turned around and boomed for the next five
years. That result provoked disbelief among the
Keynesians. After all, according to their dogma,
the relationship between the direction of a fiscal
impulse and economic activity is supposed to be
positive, not negative.

As it turns out, the correlation between a fiscal
impulse and economic activity can be either
positive or negative, depending on the state of
confidence in a government's policies. There is a
world of difference between increasing a deficit
from 8% to 12% of GDP and going from a surplus
of 2% to a deficit of 2%.

In the first instance, pump-priming would destroy
confidence and be judged foolhardy, a precursor
of financial crises and of increases in taxes,
inflation and interest rates. Consequently, the
stimulus would cause the economy to slump. On
the other hand, the latter scenario would be
regarded as quite consistent with a stable
long-run financial policy. Confidence would
remain upbeat, and a fiscal expansion would
cause the economy to accelerate.

This brings us to Japan and the current state of
the world economy. According to the
International Monetary Fund, world growth will
be 2.2% in 1999, half the 1999 rate the IMF
projected a year ago. The IMF also cautions, in
its World Economic Outlook of December 1998,
that if Japan, the world's second-largest
economy, doesn't arrest its economic slide, more
downward revisions in world growth will be
forthcoming.

Just what are the prospects for Japan? Led by
Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin and his deputy,
Lawrence Summers, the Keynesians have
escaped from their cages. And, unfortunately, the
Japanese authorities have listened to them. This
year, Japan's yawning fiscal deficit will increase
from 7% of GDP to over 10%.

Not surprisingly, the Japanese people fail to
perceive this as a credible policy, and confidence
is taking a nosedive. Since October 1998, prices
of Japanese government bonds have plunged and
yields on ten-year bonds have almost tripled,
pushing real interest rates to punishingly high
levels. Contrary to the Keynesians' claims, this
fiscal stimulus package will meet the same fate as
other recent packages. It will further exacerbate
Japan's economic problems.

Ready yourselves for more downward revisions
in world economic growth.



To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (1240)2/15/1999 3:46:00 PM
From: Chip McVickar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3536
 
Henry,

The Skeptical Investor
January 1999 Commentary
chebucto.ns.ca
.
If you are unfamiliar with this individuals work you might find his
site and regular commentary....plus his archives interesting ?

Moseley is a committed libertarian, free market economist from England
and Canada.

This piece sets-up the next area of discussion that I'd like to begin....
This is also an extension of my on going posts and your answers to them.

There is certainly a great deal of deflationary pressure underlying
what once was a major fabric of our society in North American, the
natural resource sector and farming commoditties. Undoubtably,
technology is playing a significant role in the ability of smaller nations
to access their own natural resources and bring them to market through
consortiums, appling in this manner price pressures on all commoditties
and combined with the pressures brought by a world recession....creating
an over supply and atleast the semblance of deflation.

However, it is possible that the 'fundamental' global economy has indeed
changed and..."we have already entered a major secular deflationary trend...."

If Moseley's insights are correct....I suspect that 8,500 is not far
off and 7,400 on the DJIA, may well be tested this year.

The Markets Rarely Accomodate the Majority....(but for brief moments).
This big coil in the charts of the DJIA and S&P500 is very interesting.
Which way it breaks and if a correction....how much pressure this applies
to the global economies and monetary balance will also be very interesting.
Chip



To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (1240)3/3/1999 7:39:00 PM
From: Jags  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3536
 
>>Inflation will remain tame as well as with technological change
>>being a major contributor. That will help keep interest
>>rates from being a major problem. Boomer investment and
>>international flows will also be a long term positive.

Technology has been the growth engine of the economy, its the
fastest growing segment of the economy. Plus its is deflationary i.e.
there are constant price reductions as faster, slimmer products and
services come online. The companies are making money via increased
volume inspite of decreasing prices.

But the other contributing factor to controlled inflation has been
the commodity prices being in the dumps which has been largely due
to oversupply wrt global demand, which in turn has been due to
global slowdown. Once the emerging markets bottom and start rising
the commodity index should bounce and cause inflationary pressure.

Also increased economic activity worldwide would tend to cause
outflow of international money from the US market.

Jags