Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PROLIFE who wrote (11521)	2/11/1999 7:07:00 PM
From: Ross Roberts	Respond to of 13994

Dan -- Good response, as usual. But it doesn't matter. Robert doesn't respond to reason and logic. He's a zealot. Regards, Ross

To: PROLIFE who wrote (11521)	2/12/1999 10:46:00 AM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

<< ... yes I do believe the killed(what you call aborted) babies(what you so non-chalantly call fetuses)souls are in eternity with the Father. >> Ok. Thanks for finally admitting that you believe this. Let's take it one step further. Which is better, to be in ecstasy for an eternity with the Father, or to be here on Earth? << So aborted children are ok to kill, huh? >> While you can't call a sperm a fully grown man, you can't call a week old fetus a child. But, if we do away with your disingenuous play on words, I do not feel that fetus are ok to kill. I abhor abortion. It is an awful thing to do. But, denying women reproductive freedom and placing reproductive decisions in the hands of our "out of control" fat cat politicians is far worse. Do you or do you not think that to be in ecstasy for an eternity with the Father is a goal higher than any other goal? If so, having an aborted fetus's soul go to Heaven should be a great acheivement, if you really believe what you say. << How about physically handicapped kids? How about mentally handicapped kids? >> This is all a question of women's reproductive rights. It's a very straight forward concept. My main point, over and over again has been reproductive rights. Your analogy shows, to me, that you haven't been listening very well. << Come on be a man. >> Hmmmm!? A real macho statement. I wonder if your willingness to repress women and their reproductive rights is due to your desire to dominate women?! Hey, just because a pretty blond girl in college might have turned down your advances doesn't mean you have to take out your anger on women forever! << How did you get your kids? >> It took a lot of work. Only after the first 15 years of trying did we find out that BJs weren't the correct way of doing it! <g> << Still hiding Barry? DO you let what YOU call fat cat politicians tell your wife that if she works, she WILL pay them taxes? >> So, not only are you disingenuous about your beliefs in Heaven, you don't believe in funding schools, our military defenses, our roads, our health care system, welfare, etc..... Remember, you can't take all that money of yours to Heaven. << See how stupid your statement about "womens rights " sounds now. >> It might sound stupid to you, but I'll bet that most women disagree with you. You are sounding more and more like a male that wants to have domination of women, even if it is not in their best interests, or will. << Get out from behind those skirts Barry. >> Another indirect insult against women. I hope that you don't have any daughters. Anyway, your final judgement for how well you treat others and how well you hoard your riches will be up to God at the pearly gates.