Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Liatris Spicata who wrote (11522)	2/11/1999 7:55:00 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Well there is one thing for sure. We now have a rule by poll country. I give credit to the men and women that stayed the course, even if it was not popular, and did what was right. It is also clear that TOO MANY men and women of the Senate are "worried" about their jobs rather than the truth. So next election time, let's put that to rest. Send them home to look for work. POTUS, you have skipped again, and we deserve whatever comes of it. When you decide to go to Paula Jones, and all the other women you have lied to and done wrong,and begged forgiveness, then the country can forgive you, also. To all you poll watchers, get off your butts and vote. dan

To: Liatris Spicata who wrote (11522)	2/12/1999 11:31:00 AM
From: Machaon	Respond to of 13994

<< Yeah, as a matter of fact, I did somehow miss the State of the Union addresses. Had to wash the dog. >> You are excused. I am a dog lover! In fact, the only group that was not promised something were dog special interest groups. <g> << I am suspicious of your claim that Clinton has "acted upon and implemented more of his platform than any other President in the history of modern America". >> The article was in the Miami Herald. It listed the results of every one of Clinton's platform pledges. It was quite impressive. I will try and get a copy and post it. << Instead of coming up with insults based on my name, I suggest you discuss ideas- >> I only called you King Sherwood because you look down upon the American Voter. Take back your insult towards the people and I will give you a more fitting title. <g> If I am not discussing ideas, how come you are responding to my non existent ideas? <g> << You seem to think you are really saying something with your references to "King Sherwood" (has a nice ring to it, I'll admit) but it really displays the vacuous namecalling of those with nothing intelligent to say. >> King Sherwood??????? Namecalling!? That's certainly a mild form of name calling. Have you seen what I am called every day. The Republican radicals on this thread don't care if young people might be reading these notes, or who it offends. They fault me when I call them mean spirited, and then they spew insult after insult. I guess that is the new Republican Platform, "Spewing Hatred" and "Family Infidelity Values".