SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Royal Oak-RYO -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michael Bidder who wrote (1607)2/11/1999 6:05:00 PM
From: steve gilchrist  Respond to of 1706
 
Michael, you might enjoy reading the National Post autopsy at

nationalpost.com

I agree that Peggy is made of the right stuff and is as feisty as anyone, but the formula for success includes a lot of lucky timing as well, and it appears that she hasn't been able to attract any of that. RYO may go down, but I won't be kicking myself; it was a logical speculative choice with every chance of success. One tends to lose two or three of every ten spec stocks in your stable; it'll be sad if this turns out to be one as well, but we can't fight the POG.
One ought to "bet on the jockey, not on the horse"; if she gets another horse under her after this, I'll probably bet on her again.

Steve G>)



To: Michael Bidder who wrote (1607)2/11/1999 7:25:00 PM
From: Al Cern  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1706
 
Sounds like an obituary to me Michael. The article from the National Post could have been written when the last financing took place. It was pretty obvious what was going to happen then, given who the players were, and how the deal was structured. The amazing thing is that there is still plenty of money to be made here.

Sincerely,

Al Cern



To: Michael Bidder who wrote (1607)2/16/1999 11:30:00 PM
From: Michael Markham  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1706
 
Say that now after all the stuff you have said all this time!!Shame on you. I thought you were always short talking down the stock but now you are proved correct but dont give Her any credit, I should of figured. This sucks. Regards