Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gord Bolton who wrote (14488)	2/11/1999 8:19:00 PM
From: RMF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

Gord, I'm not a real true believer yet. When a jr. explorer says they have something that we've never seen before (at least in this hemisphere) I'm a bit cautious. That's why I'm in ABER so far and not WSP. I was just saying that my investment probably won't be affected by Red or Teevee. This is probably a dumb question, but why don't the people on this thread simply ignore Paquet. If you treated him as if he wasn't here he wouldn't be here.

To: Gord Bolton who wrote (14488)	2/11/1999 8:24:00 PM
From: wayne cath	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26850

I agree ,Gord .....its looking like LAB didn't even impress the CEO of the company . If ever a situation needed some further investigation its that one. I didn't get burnt but I was somewhat outspoken regarding some of the hypish posting at the time. Current behavior on this thread is starting to make that look good though. Why in your opinion is this stock having so much difficulty picking up steam. I tend to be very analytical and can't accept that I am blinded by hope and promise. With a reputable institution giving a price target of 17 bucks and the stock moves 6 cents gives me a feeling of unease........ "etc" suggested a while back that 5 million shares overhanging the market that become tradeable in March was the trouble ....... wayne