Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Audio and Radio on the Internet- NAVR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Curbstone who wrote (7631)	2/12/1999 1:43:00 PM
From: Dr. Id	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27722

Mike, I think to equate a blowjob in the oval office with a double-murder or a severe beating by police is reactionary hyperbole. Was Clinton guilty of lying about getting a hummer from an intern? No question. Does he deserve to be thrown out of office for it? Obviously not (if you respect the Constitutional process). Was OJ guilty? Of course. Was Fuhrman a racist cop? Yes, but it had nothing to do with it. Just as Ken Starr's obsessions had nothing to do with whether Clinton had lied or not. Ken Starr is more culpable than Fuhrman in that he did set up Clinton. Fuhrman didn't lead OJ to kill Nicole.