Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (33845)	2/12/1999 2:03:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Another example of how the Presidency has been cheapened by scumbag Bill. JLA

To: TigerPaw who wrote (33845)	2/12/1999 2:09:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Here I reveal myself to be a fink... Although I would certainly have voted for impeachment, and probably voted for removal, I think that Chris Shays was not wrong in saying that men of good will could differ on the correct way of handling this, considering factors like gravity and possible impact on the country. Therefore, while I think that this is nothing to play the bongos about, I am content that the House did its duty, and that the process went forward, and I can live without Clinton's removal. I still think that if he were honorable, he would resign...