Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: john t. brice who wrote (8237)	2/12/1999 3:27:00 PM
From: hcirteg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Duckster et al: I too listened in. We are home boys (no pun inteneded). I am so happy that LEV handled himself the way he did. He gave us every signal he could. Loved the pre-amble about maganese.... Market reaction up is just begining....did you hear the nmaes of the brokerages that asked questions? Nice.... Yeah baby.... HC

To: john t. brice who wrote (8237)	2/12/1999 3:29:00 PM
From: Dennis V.	Respond to of 27311

Thanks John, your notes on the capacity of the lines were better than my memory. I concur with all.

To: john t. brice who wrote (8237)	2/12/1999 3:32:00 PM
From: Chuck Lehman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

John, Regarding the laminate sales. I heard Lev say that they had been approached by someone wanting to buy their laminate. I got the impression that he was not really that interested in selling to other than VLNC's partners. Chuck

To: john t. brice who wrote (8237)	2/12/1999 3:36:00 PM
From: Rich Wolf	Respond to of 27311

re: Japanese 'competition' and Barrons article: Lev's response to the question about the Barrons article: 'Two producers, both using cobalt. their announced energy densities were less than Valence's. Their announced production capacities were well below Valence's. The cell sizes announced are smaller than Valence's smallest battery. (ed. note: not because of need, since Valence can make that small, if they want to), because they cannot make them larger without having safety problems.' These comments were NEW, and not made at the shareholder's meeting.