Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (33862)	2/12/1999 3:42:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

> I dont know if you are any of these, but I can assure you that if you could elucidate the family values platform, why it is there and what purpose it serves, I could poke a few hundred holes in it. Broad, attacking generalizations that the far right tends to make are just like that.< Would you consider these to be broad attacking generalizations? : From Michelle: >[Conservatives] - in fact your entire party - are a group that cannot accept changing times, they are not intelligent enough to make it in the workforce or something and their only recourse is to come up with this drivel.< >Get lost! Get a real platform.... how about, mathematics education? Why dont you help the housewives of the world learn how to divide fractions or soemthing.<

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (33862)	2/13/1999 12:14:00 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Michelle, see your post 33751. I will quote: "What is it that guys like you fear about successful women? Is it that you are afraid that your housewives (who you care for) will disappear?" A:) My wife is a successful woman, and we have a wonderful relationship. I do not fear successful women. B:) My wife is not a housewife whom I take care of. Explain to me how these are not assumptions about my personal life, and presumptuous speculations about my attitudes.