Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Fairmile Gold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Stakiw who wrote (3880)	2/12/1999 5:08:00 PM
From: Luce Wildebeest	Respond to of 4057

I've so far lost a fair bit of change Steve but I do appreciate you hanging in there under some rough circumstances. Enjoy your weekend. Calvin

To: Steve Stakiw who wrote (3880)	2/14/1999 7:06:00 PM
From: Douglas Simpson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4057

Steve Please provide an example. IF a director has 300,000 options at .16 cents at 5 - 1 split would mean ....?

To: Steve Stakiw who wrote (3880)	2/15/1999 10:21:00 AM
From: Douglas Simpson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4057

Steve and All The role back is only good for those people who have shares upwards of of about 300,000 thousand or so. For example when the stock is rolled back it will be trading at about 15 cents. When the stock goes up to 23 or 24 cents on huge volume all the directors will be dumping while the rest of us are waiting for it to go higher. The average investor with a few thousand shares will profit nothing from this role back. It is only for the benefit of those who have a lot of shares, the directors. Please everyone Vote against a roll back Your vote can make a difference