SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (1894)2/12/1999 7:44:00 PM
From: Peter O'Brien  Respond to of 2390
 
Such a regulation may indeed be ridiculous...

However, the argument about whether or not a regulation
is ridiculous is a wholly separate argument from the
argument about whether or not such a regulation (given
that it exists) should be enforced equally.

How would you feel if the principal who created this
regulation had expelled other children who were caught,
yet intervened to prevent his own child from being
expelled?



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (1894)2/15/1999 10:13:00 AM
From: J.B.C.  Respond to of 2390
 
>>How do you feel about the zero tolerance policy in some schools? Like lets say your kid is told repeatedly that no drugs are allowed at school, and then one day he brings in some allerest or something because hes allergic to the grass. He thinks he can get away with it but gets caught. Do you think he should dutifully be expelled? Im curious because I think these types of regulations are ridiculous, but there is a group that supports them - maybe you are one of those. <<

I agree that they're ridiculous. Like last year in Colorado a girl faced permanent expulsion because her mother packed a pairing knife in her lunch to cut a pear. She turned herself in and they expelled her. The school superintendent didn't have the gut's to overturn the expulsion because he said "that's what the rule told him he should do". Finally someone with a cooler head on their shoulders said this is stupid, and they let the girl back in to school. She was an "a" Student. Or, the girl who got expelled because she gave a friend Midal, because she had cramps, stupid!

I think that these regulations are intended to keep drugs that we consider banned substances out of school, but why are they even needed? Isn't crack, marijauana, cocaine already illegal? These additional school regulations are totally unnecessary.

Jim