Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : GTCI - get in before the news hits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bobcat who wrote (538)	2/12/1999 8:46:00 PM
From: ztect	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1541

Bobcat... You're right...I made a boo boob..in my haste. But the 30,000 extra y2k compliant computers don't in any way alter my point that there simply aren't a lot of computers- y2k compliant or not- in China a country with over a billion people, and that there aren't many computers relative to the United States... So how the heck are they are going to market a y2k fix to a very very small market...and how can the PR company issue a "report" with hysterical language like the one that WSRG did...undermine all credibility of that report.. Final note.... Funny, how in junior year of high school, I taught myself multi-variable calculus to calculate the sequential quenching rates of fluorescent dyes in ternary organic compounds...and now I can't even set up a simple algebraic equation..... LOL....getting old and senile in my young age ztect

To: Bobcat who wrote (538)	2/12/1999 8:49:00 PM
From: Bobcat	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1541

ztect I might add I am not real sure what your point is at this time. I have read so much I am somewhat loss. However for the last two days I have been following this GTCI stock. Have also read a few articles lately issued by SEC on these internet organizations pushing junk stocks. From all that I can read and determine this stock is a pure joke. If it rises $.25 it keeps slipping back. I hope nobody on this thread holds their breath for this stock to earn $.69 in 1999 let alone $1.10 in year 2000. That is very likely to be pure garbage.