Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Mako Capital Co. (MAKO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (98)	2/13/1999 1:37:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 501

it amazes me that you, as self proclaimed 'art historian' feel you have any credibility Well gee, Spidey, it doesn't seem to amaze the people at Fortune, or the WSJ, or Bloomberg, now does it? Have you read that Bloomberg article yet; only just out, of course? And guess what? There's more to come... We've got credibility in spades, Spidey. YOU don't. Will address your other questions in another post. But don't you think it'd be better to take this discussion to the AZNT thread, where it belongs? Or are you afraid AZNT management'll be pissed off if they know you're posting?

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (98)	2/13/1999 2:33:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 501

Your post is mostly gibberish, Spidey, but I'll do what I can. i can only echo what bob quiel has told you already. Quiel's told me pretty much nothing. He's been extremely evasive. in addition i can tell you dean 'the INFILTRATOR's analysis & your basher math is flawed in your attempt to discern a number favorable to your premise there is 'no short' @ aznt. 'Fraid it's not flawed, Spidey. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Or even trying to talk about. And alas you refuse to address the question of the large number of shares whose restrictions expire in the very near future, or the question of all that paper Mikey's issued in recent months. Some of it to YOU, eh? & bob quiels 6 hrs. of testimony showing that the only one "hurt" by the freeze being lifted are those short against the 4.48 million shares andy mann stold, the co. cancelled & aznt seeks to be removed from the system. The first part of this dubious statement is utter nonsense. The second part is untrue: as I keep telling you: Mikey can't cancel shares that aren't in his possession. Q.E.D. dean also with his retarded logic ADDED Charlie's 224K into the mix. i saw the forensic's specialist's report that charlie's wife's cert was doctored with a second date added "at a much later date". Has the forensic specialist examined the original cert? Or has he just seen copies? lolololol. charlies stock was restricted & the restrictions have not been met. the stock besides is "voting only" Huh? Why are you incapable of realizing that this makes no sense at all? Why would "voting only" stock have a time restriction? What rubbish, Spidey. Surely even YOU can do better. did you subtract the 200k shares of gary chimino that have been cancelled? Again: if Mikey wants to cancel that stock he's gonna have to take Chimino to court. as you know aznt will proceed in it's defamation & libel case against you & your group of penny stock bashers. I very much doubt that. As I've noted, we've got credibility, we've got media contacts, we've got public support. We've also got a whole lotta interesting information. AZNT would be insane to try it. Disappointing. I was SO looking forward to the trip to the Hoover Dam, as you know. by the very fact that no credible authoritative body , like NASD, sanctions or recognizes your vigilante work Permit me to suggest once again that you read that Bloomberg article. You'll find that representatives of several agencies say they do indeed pay a good deal of attention to the questions raised by online inquisitors... Didja lose that URL? bloomberg.com Love that title: "Caught in a Web of Deceit". Remind you of anything, Spidey???

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (98)	2/16/1999 6:29:00 AM
From: tonto	Respond to of 501

Pugs, why did you advise on many threads the wrong RMIL share counts? How does this story differ from your last "analysis" and free advice you gave to too many on too many threads? Do you feel at all responsible for being so wrong and not wavering on your wrong position? for dean to ADD this stock to the mix again demonstrates how far removed your group is & how worthless your analysis is. in your basher math you came up with a float of 1.3mm shares. did you subtract the cancelled 440k shares zapara stold from the co. that since have been cancelled or are you still telling investors case # a38.. was a "lie" & "never existed"? lololol ! did you subtract the 200k shares of gary chimino that have been cancelled? did you subtract another 200k of tightly held insider shares? do this math & you start to see why isaac montal feel some will be "hurt by the resulting short squeeze".