Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mrknowitall who wrote (11650)	2/13/1999 3:59:00 PM
From: Don Hurst	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Mr Knowitall: Re your " Lowly "citizens" like you or me will still be prosecuted and sentenced for such things." comment; Gee, do you think it is possible that I could get an "independent" prosecutor to spend $40 million plus to investigate me? I need the after it is over book profits. Regards, Don

To: mrknowitall who wrote (11650)	2/13/1999 4:23:00 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

<< It does not mean he was NOT GUILTY. >> Yes it does! Ken Starr spent $44 million to investigate President Clinton. He came up with nothing, except for a little nookey in the White House. Anyone who has been investigated by a band of 100 lawyers, spending $44 million to find the smallest crime and came up with nothing, is close to a saint! Couldn't we agree on that? I find it incredible that President Clinton has such an extremely clean record. We are lucky to have such an honest, capable man in the White House. I would never have expected any politician alive or dead to have been able to withstand such an investigation. My hats off to President Clinton. Lead us to the 21st century!