Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lockeon who wrote (98806)	2/13/1999 4:20:00 PM
From: Mohan Marette	Respond to of 176387

There is something fishy going on in Denmark.(Too bad this all legal) Lockeon: Excellent little find my friend,it appears there is more to it than meets the eye.I would like to take peek at Robertson stevens' trades for the last few days.Too bad this is all legal.

To: Lockeon who wrote (98806)	2/13/1999 5:40:00 PM
From: TwoToTango	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 176387

RE: <<the company had "a fabulous finish to the year," said BancBoston Robertson Stephens analyst Daniel Niles. Niles officially projects Dell will post earnings of 30 cents a share on revenue of $5.47 billion for the quarter, although he said the company's earnings will probably come in closer to 32 cents to 33 cents a share and its revenue will likely be over $5.5 billion.">> Great detective work, Lockeon!!! Someone should fax this to CNBC and urge them to track down Niles (wonder if he'll still be travelin' on Tuesday) After all, Niles deserves a forum to explain the rationale for his flip-flop, right? Why wasn't the end of the quarter so "fabulous" after all? Did some new information come to light in the past 11 days that caused such a dramatic change in sentiment? He must have a very good explanation, right? After all, he's not just some junior analyst. CNBC would probably never follow up on the lead (I think they'd be delighted to see Dell drop another 12 points.....that keeps people tuned in, doesn't it?) But they should. This is quite a story.

To: Lockeon who wrote (98806)	2/13/1999 5:41:00 PM
From: Catcher	Respond to of 176387

Lockeon, i just read your post re niles/rob-stvens dell statement 11 days ago. have not read responses to your post but am inclined to join in with any others who want to pressure cnbc or rob/stevens for an explanation. at the very least we might ho[pe for press exposure that would minimize liklihood for this apparently blatant manipulation in future i understand that small fries like me need to watch out for my own $s and the above may be incredibly naive but agree 100% that something is f i s h y here

To: Lockeon who wrote (98806)	2/14/1999 6:17:00 AM
From: Mick Mørmøny	Respond to of 176387

What one man (Daniel Niles) can invent, another (Lockeon) can discover. My dear Lockeon, there we come into those realms of conjecture (we believe) where the most logical mind may be at fault. With apologies to SIR ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE, from the lips of Sherlock Holmes. Lockeon, please do the Dellheads another favor. Bar the doors of the Instinet Tuesday P.M. and the NAZ Wednesday A.M., and do not disturb the bears in the middle of their dreams. Thank you and good day! Beni2 Mick Mormony