SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (2857)2/13/1999 6:06:00 PM
From: John Biddle  Respond to of 12823
 
Frank,

First, no offense intended, and none taken. I'm surely claiming no expertise, just trying to improve my understanding. Isn't it annoying how much more effort it takes to avoid having one's intentions misinterpreted in cyberspace than it is face to face?

Once the infrastructure's built, the providers continue to pay the same no matter how much traffic runs on it. A great plan which brings customers and money to one and away from another (as I believe nationwide coverage has done for T and FON and will do for others if they hurry) helps immensely. And it will hurt everyone else alot.

All is not equal here though as Sprint has a lower per minute cost structure with CDMA than AT&T has with Analog and TDMA. If Sprint can attract customers fast enough, it can hurt T by underpricing, since it has a much greater carrying capacity (3 to 1 over TDMA and 10 to 1 over analog). If neither are close to full the advantage vanishes. Guess what Sprint is going to do against its only nationwide competitor? And for every dollar going forward Sprint gets 3 times the capacity that T gets? And easy upgrade to 3G too?

Voice is hard over IP. Customers immediately notice any delay and are unforgiving. Data doesn't have these problems. Even video, unless it is two way, is largely immune to problems if a little caching and time delay is used (a one second buffer, once, will be easily forgiven and will keep IP video transmissions virtually defect free).

The existing infrastructure for voice is already there and is actually getting more capacious as data is being removed from it. Why not just continue to use it for voice until well down the road?

John



To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (2857)2/13/1999 7:22:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Respond to of 12823
 
All, the following article from multichannel news, courtesy of Hiram Walker on the HLIT thread, speaks about additional DOCSIS certification delays. FAC

multichannel.com

Further DOCSIS Delays Will Stall Massive Modem Rollout

By FRED DAWSON    February 15, 1999 Denver -- The completion of standards for certifying cable modems faces new uncertainties, executives reported last week, prompting speculation that massive rollouts of the new gear won't be possible until this fall.

The situation came to light here during a Cable Television Laboratories Inc.-sponsored briefing for analysts on new cable technology.

The good news is that the process of certifying modems embedded in personal computers could come quickly on the heels of completing the same procedure for external modems. This could add momentum to cable's retail strategy in 2000, said Rouzbeh Yassini, project leader of the DOCSIS (Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification) process.

"By crossing every 't' and dotting every 'i' as we complete certification of external modems, we are making it possible that the embedded [modem-certification] cycle could move faster," he said.

Yassini shied away from nailing down a date for completion of the certification, which was widely expected to wrap up this past fall.

When last interviewed on the subject nearly two months ago, Yassini indicated that his group was hoping to certify at least some vendors' modems by early March. Now, following repeated questions from the audience, he said he was optimistic that this could happen by the end of March, although he could not be sure.

"A month or two, in the context of what the industry has accomplished in creating such a standard, is really nothing," he added.

Operators are so confident that vendors' products largely conform to the complex set of DOCSIS protocols that they have launched new markets using DOCSIS headend equipment, instead of deploying proprietary systems.

In dozens of markets in the United States and Canada, operators are hooking up customers using uncertified DOCSIS modems on the understanding that they can bring the modems into conformance through software downloads.

But the ongoing delays in certification are taking a toll: They have set back the onset of massive retail distribution, as well as cable's marketing efforts for new modems. Moreover, they have postponed the massive industry switchover to DOCSIS in systems that are now using proprietary equipment.

General Instrument Corp. CEO Ed Breen acknowledged to analysts in a teleconference last week that his company is "slightly frustrated that this product has not launched en masse in the marketplace. If everybody were honest and open, you'd hear the same thing."

Breen said that as a result of the certification delays, "the real volumes will still be another couple to three months off. Some product is being shipped now, and the downloads will be done to bring them up to DOCSIS status."

At the CableLabs conference, Bruce Stone, corporate vice president and general manager for the multimedia group at Motorola Inc., spoke of an even longer time line for his company's DOCSIS products.

He expressed hope that meaningful field trials of certified modem systems will begin on a large scale in the "back-to-school time frame," with commercial launches and promotions of the new gear in time for "a fairly active" holiday season.

By that time, Stone added, Motorola will be shipping DOCSIS modems that have interconnections with home telephone wiring built into the chip sets, allowing multiple PCs to operate off the same high-speed-data connection.

"We believe that the linking of multiple PCs in the home will be a very rapid process that starts to happen in late '99, as the prices of PCs continue to drop," Stone said. "The real question that we had was whether we could take the DOCSIS modem and leverage it with PNA [the Phone Network Alliance protocol]."

PNA connections, now available in some PC models, allow users to plug all of their PC modems into wall jacks and to operate off a single dial-up Internet connection. Cable would have a tough time reaching a mass market for this service if the DOCSIS modems couldn't interconnect via the PNA protocol.

"We'll have a product in the market that does this by late this year," Stone said.

Delays or not, vendors made it clear that the transition to retail distribution is an evolutionary process that will require hard bargaining and a lot of experimentation before it reaches mass-market proportions.

"We're having dialogues with major retailers like Best Buy [Inc.], Circuit City [Stores Inc.], Sears [Sears, Roebuck and Co.] and RadioShack, but there are no agreements yet for distribution of our DOCSIS modems," said Carl Bruhn, general manager for RCA broadband products at Thomson Consumer Electronics.

There is "across-the-board" interest in stocking cable modems in the retail community, Bruhn said, adding, "We think that there will be a significant test market for retail distribution of DOCSIS this year."

But, he added, retailers must be convinced that MSOs are committed to retail distribution and that high-speed-data services are available over a large enough portion of upgraded cable systems to make stocking the products worthwhile.

If one-half of the households owning PCs -- currently representing 48 percent of the market -- were to sign up for cable-data services, that 24 percent penetration would represent a savings of $6 billion in equipment costs for the industry if the consumers buy the modems, Bruhn said.

The key issue right now is what retailers can expect as far as residual returns on support for modems beyond their initial margin on the unit sale, Bruhn added.

"That's where most of the conversation is focused right now," he noted, declining to say what the retailers are asking for.

Retailers are interested in gaining a share of ongoing revenues as compensation not only for stocking the gear, but also for providing technical assistance to customers. In addition, they believe that the marketing support that stocking the modems affords cable in selling its high-speed-data services merits some measure of compensation.

Nonetheless, vendors said, they don't view retailer residuals as a major barrier.

"We're seeing a lot of flexibility from retailers working with MSOs and manufacturers," said Mark Stubbe, vice president of the networks division at Samsung Telecommunications America Inc.

In fact, he added, not all retailers are firmly committed to getting residual compensation.

But beyond retailer support for stand-alone modems, the key to real momentum in consumer acceptance of DOCSIS is the availability of modems as embedded components of PCs, Stubbe said.

"We're working very hard to drive the costs of equipment down as quickly as we can," he added.

Stone and Bruhn agreed, stressing the significance that they place on the OEM (original-equipment-manufacturer) PC market in their strategic commitment to DOCSIS.

"Most of our business plan is built around the OEM market, Bruhn said.

Thomson's commitment to making DOCSIS a "core competency" at the chip level is based on its belief that the modems will be "the front-end technology for a whole variety of products in the home, from the telephone, to set-tops, to means of connecting TV sets to the cable network," Bruhn added.

But first, the embedded-device versions of DOCSIS must be certified. This could come within six months of whenever external-modem certification is wrapped up, Yassini said.

.