Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: garz who wrote (9930)	2/14/1999 10:48:00 AM
From: Roy F. Baker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 40688

STOP IT! STOP IT! STOP IT! Alright I confess Clinton isn't guilty! I did it in the library with a candlestick (Pardon me thats Hilary's line)! Hey people enough of this. I have an idea. Go to the Malko chat room and use that space for all future Clinton/Sex talk. Thanks. Roy

To: garz who wrote (9930)	2/14/1999 11:00:00 AM
From: Ted M	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 40688

OT, Look, I'm no expert on all of this but even as a casual observer it is obvious that Starr and the Republicans desperately wanted to 'get' Clinton on something. They spent millions of dollars investigating everything under the sun and all they could come up with was irrelevant testimony in a trial that should never have happened while the President of the United States was in office in the first place. I might remind you that the Jones lost the trial. To use a sperm stained dress (weird), and covert phone tapings to force him to admit his misdeeds and for the American people to gobble it up, salivating at the salaciousness of it all is just pathetic. Anyway, you want to know why the lie he told to the American people and the Grand jury has no emotional response from me unlike it does so many out there? Simply this: I didn't care if he had an affair, and I didn't think that if he did it was my or any other non-family member's right to know if he did. And the whole issue of digging further than the Paula Jones's lawyers to find a flaw in the case testimony was just plain ugly politics, pure and simple. That's why I don't take his actions personally. Repugnant yes, but of any significance to Americans no. It astounds me that people get caught up in the simplistic notion that he lied and should therefore be punished. Where is the common sense here?? Ted