SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CigarHolder who wrote (10022)2/14/1999 9:49:00 PM
From: From_Verbier  Respond to of 40688
 
Woooooooeeeeeee! Just finished reading the past 100 posts, nothing that I wanted to know in those...
I usually switch channels at 7:00PM from CNBC to whatever or turned it off!
How do I switch channels here, it says PNLK channel, but I kept getting the same crap that is on CNBC after 7:00pm for almost a year now....

Come on guys and girls, nothing wrong to talk about the Prez...and the future of the nation but isn't there a thread dedicated to this kind of subject somewhere on the Net ?????

From_Verbier...



To: CigarHolder who wrote (10022)2/14/1999 9:55:00 PM
From: terri acey  Respond to of 40688
 
Ah...well since there have been many quotes attributed by our founding forefathers today..I thought I would capture a paragraph from today's Wash Post for your continued reading enjoyment...

...."There was an apparent contest among senators over who could quote the most people, with extra points for founding fathers; Sen.Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.) was near the top of the list with citations from Hamilton,James Madison, Gerald R. Ford, Robert J. Dole, Rep. Robert L. Barr Jr. (R-Ga.), and his own legal mentor, Sid Balick. Many Democrats were particularly happy to quote one of the managers, Rep.Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) who said "reasonable people" could disagree on whether to remove the president.
Sen. Wayne Allard (R-Colo.) managed to quote George Washington and Supreme Court opinions as well as the Boy Scout Oath and the Girl Scout Promise. Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) recalled a phone call from a mother who had considered the Clinton case nothing more than a partisan witch hunt-until her teenage son tried to excuse his own lying by saying he understood what he said to be true at the time...."

I found this last sentence to be the most poignant of the whole article......



To: CigarHolder who wrote (10022)2/14/1999 10:34:00 PM
From: ztect  Respond to of 40688
 
Funny Cigar, below is a partial re-post of a Partial Re-post....Back on Topic....

that I did NOT get a response to...yet I got at least thirty responses to my off topic points...and just returned the counter points in kind...Now it seems as Bubba Bill ..is the reason why children lie..Good Grief...Charlie Brown.....Don't blame me that no one wanted to talk about my analysis regarding PNL below......Thought it was insightful and might provoke conversation...but YOU want to talk about whether Bubba is the Buddha? Geeze don't even know why I try on this thread sometimes...Now again, below is my post regarding D&B for conversation and discussion...anyone want to do some 'dd' on SAP ag....Are y'all capable...don't wish to be demeaning but....I find the irony is getting too much to bare here.....I even gotta another post from the Bald Eagle wannabe Dix as I was writing this message, who never responded to my original post of this repost on topic about PNL...Geeze I'm starting to agree with Baldy about how some one with a company posting on the company thread diminishes not only the thread, but the perception of that company...Seems like with DIX...that rules now transcends beyond just the company he represents....to ALL of his investments on SI...

Well anyway....Good night....


Sincerely,

ztect

btw- If you read this other post to Dix...I already gave my reasons why I'd acquit OJ based on Marsha Clark's miserable presentation....

techstocks.com

Thus OJ innocent? I don't know...Not proven guilty by Marsha Clark in accordance with Scottish Law? Yes.

Again sorry that I choose to formulate my own opinions...don't let the media or the majority opinion sway me into consensus...If I didn't form my own opinions, and I succumbed to popular opinion...I sure as heck wouldn't invest in PNLK......I'd have left this stock long ago...and from what I hear from many...my contributions to this thread wouldn't have been missed....
=================================================
==================================================
The repost of the re-post of the post....that no one wanting to talk about issues "on topic" wished to discuss....Again Charlie Brown....GOOD GRIEF!
=======

So now back on topic....PNL...HOORAY !!!

I posted the D&B article and purposely didn't state what I felt the implications were immediately....because I wanted to see what others had to say first....

There were a number of interesting observations that were made that I hadn't noticed myself...

But I did add the possible SAP and PNLK association through D&B or even possibly a not yet direct partnership between SAP & PNLK.....

Though rather than flame any potential rumors....

Let me state the importance to me of the D&B news was the potential impact upon the quality and usefulness of PNLK's database and how this database can be used not only for better finding PARTNERS ....but also for recording the effectiveness of transactions that occur between these newly found and established relationships....

One "flaw" of the existing data-base is its "real" usefulness...

I put "flaw" in quotes...because flaw is really a misnomer to the extent that the D & B database when first implemented was reflective of Internet development at that particular moment in "Internet" time.

Thus the D & B news and the partnership with SAP AG demonstrate that D & B is moving like the rest of the Internet....D & B is moving VERY fast to get up to speed with providing useful online information.......like the information and databases shared with PNLK...

Or in other words...D & B + SAP = Great news for PNL even if PNL does not equal SAP....BUT even greater news if PNL does equal SAP...

Sincerely,

ztect