Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCH Technologies (DCH) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sid Turtlman who wrote (575)	2/15/1999 9:45:00 AM
From: Scoobah	Respond to of 2513

Paste your email to this board Sid or you have no credibility and other people will soon tire of you as surely as I have. If you want to oppose me then take your case to court. I am tired of listening to you already.

To: Sid Turtlman who wrote (575)	2/15/1999 10:02:00 AM
From: wpckr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2513

What is your email address, turtleman?

To: Sid Turtlman who wrote (575)	2/16/1999 2:28:00 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2513

Sid, I don't believe that annonimity on S.I. necessarily implies a lack of credibility. Far from it. I've no problem with you not revealing yourself, and your reasons are logical in general- as far as that goes. But you have no back up to your statements as to Who is Who nor what is what. You state that the research reports are "phony" without a scrap of evidence. Let's see, research reports posted here claim associations with national laboratories, Dupont, shipped sensors for Westinghouse, association with Freewing, patents owned, and on and on and on including, if one reads, the name drop of Burt Rutan. Oh, and this is the Cabot Market Letter Stock of the Year. What's "phony" in this information? Why would a "scam" expect to long exist by the tactic of lying about what you apparently consider to be false associations with some of the largest names in research and industry? Have you anything to offer here other than your experience with scams and your ready and seemingly groundless willingness to jump to assume this Co. is one? Perhaps you'd like to imply that if Ballard is successful there is no chance that DCHT sensors will be used on most or all of their engines? Give us a good reason why you'd poo pooh this notion and then you'd be offering something here. Maybe someone can explain why Ballard can provide their own sensors- or won't likely be required to employ sensors at all? The posts of "john" recently were meaningless. Posting information here, even in great abundance by one participant, is simply not out of line, except possibly to the extent that some of it is repetative. A stock like this will trade on expectations for the future. If the technology doesn't actually exist, and the associations named don't exist, and the sales don't actually exist---then the outlook for the future won't exist--and if this were the case, the stock would fail very quickly without your help. Picking a dozen of the largest names around as partners, etc., then plastering same all over the place is not the way for a "scam" to survive long at all. Any reasonable person can see your posts offer little of value save a discussion of the companies method of paying employees with stock...which if true, might actually be considered a VERY positive business practice. The potential existence of employeees with the wherewithal to get by and enough belief in the companies prospects to accept this form of payment has to be a positive sign. NO? As for paying a promoter to promote, it seems DCHT denies doing so. While the circumstances are at least mildly curious in this regard, prove them liars, eh Sid? Show the goods Sid, and I'll be the first to be disgusted at that lie from this company. Bottom line is, Sid, show us a single false bit of info in those "phony" research reports, or please quit calling them "phony." Ok? I welcome the negative on any thread, if it's got substance. You've shown none, and all should readily see that...you waste more space than I do with this post.