SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (49652)2/15/1999 1:10:00 PM
From: Burt Masnick  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579775
 
Re:This does not make the management of AMD liars. How could Jerry have known about the accelerated clock speed and price cutting ramp of Celeron?

I would ask the other question. How could Jerry NOT have known that accelerated clocks were more than possible with the Celeron - the Celeron speed distribution has been said ON THIS THREAD to be centered at 450. How could he have not known that there was pricing room to spare due to the excellent yields Intel routinely achieves. The problem is that Jerry's business model is flawed but could conceivably work if the execution was letter perfect. Unfortunately for AMD shareholders, the execution has been, well, AMDish. Whether AMD has lied is moot - more to the point is that they have been wrong and wrong fairly consistently. AMD and you are shocked, shocked that Intel will compete with them vigorously. Prepare for more shocks.

Good investing,
Burt



To: Scumbria who wrote (49652)2/15/1999 1:41:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579775
 
Re: "Investors in companies like AMD which compete against gigantic, rich monopolies (like Intel)"

AMD supporters have been telling us for months that Intel no longer controls the market, AMD is selling to all top tier boxmakers save 1 and that AMD is now competitive with Intel. So which is it? A monopoly or no monopoly?

EP