Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j g cordes who wrote (11723)	2/15/1999 3:44:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

You've made some erroneous statements IMO about how you feel Starr should have run his investigation. I was trying to determine if this was a layman's viewpoint as I suspected or, if you were a lawyer, I had hoped to contrast the type of practice you have with the work Starr has at hand. No matter. Apparently you feel that context has no bearing on such things. That is your "unusual" stance I'd venture. With respect to net privacy, I don't feel "obliged" to reveal anything about myself but certain points have come up in "conversations" with others on these threads. As I mentioned, unlike Clinton, I don't make a habit, career or life out of lying. Consequently, I think I have little to fear by being upfront in attitude or in saying directly what's on my mind. That's a concept Bubba seems to have a great deal of trouble with. Very hard for me to see how such a stance is not in keeping with the traditions of freedom. I post under my own name and anybody who wants to find me (my office anyway) could. Sunlight as they say is the best disinfectant. What exactly is it you feel you have to fear? JLA BTW, note the other reponse to your last message for me before you judge me on any alleged ad hominem posts I have made.