Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Tut Systems, Inc. (TUTS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dakota Sullivan who wrote (103)	2/16/1999 9:59:00 AM
From: FNS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 293

Dakota: >>how do you establish a value for a stock like this? << You can't....just buy it and forget, or buy quality like T or WCOM!!! But selling seems to have dried up a little...hoping the stock will stablize in here and start moving up. Very thin float...2.5M float. Good luck, FNS

To: Dakota Sullivan who wrote (103)	2/18/1999 8:00:00 PM
From: CJ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 293

<losses increase each year since inception> Dakota: I was not going to come back to this thread after my pre & post IPO warnings; but a friend showed me some recent posts he printed and asked my reply. IMHO, you have hit exactly what the problem with this Co. is -- which is being, and will continue to be, reflected in the stock. This Co. has a proven performance, and it's not good; as opposed to other internet Co's. someone on this thread tried to compare it to ---> a major difference is that those Co's may not be profitable yet; but their losses are decreasing with each quarter, and their potential is great. A very big difference. Don't all of you realize that the funding of the IPO fully reimbursed the venture capitalists, MSFT, AT&T Ventures, etc. and they are [or will soon be] gone? The Officers & Directors have made a fortune, which would be ok IF TUTS products and sales were showing improvement and significant potential in the future. Perhaps we are wrong. For your sakes, I hope so. Good luck to all of you. CJ p.s Dakota: In answer to your question, as of appx. 6 months ago, the value of this stock was +/- $5.80 pr. shr. Add whatever you think is best for the future potential.