Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CMOZ, next cmgi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob Davis who wrote (454)	2/15/1999 10:55:00 PM
From: Mark B. Stutman	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 947

Bob: I searched around the link for awhile, but could find no reference to CMOZ on the home page or the 'Blivit' link page on the lower left column. Could you please point me to the CMOZ reference?? Thanks, Mark

To: Bob Davis who wrote (454)	2/15/1999 11:39:00 PM
From: Mr.Kups	Respond to of 947

Dear Bob Davis (The Napeague Letter) I would like to respond to you shallow report on CMOZ. Just what are you trying to say Bob,about this non reporting stock that happened to been scooped up by stock detective. Is this suppose to be something we don't already know. Bob come on give us something better than that! Is this stock a ripoff, scam, come on Bob,be more specific Bob what are your implications of sleazy baseball.Is cmoz a sleazy stock is that it. Well i would like you to just come out and say it Bob. Because so its been easier to read between the lines of the CMOZ press releases, than your reporting.

To: Bob Davis who wrote (454)	2/16/1999 3:46:00 AM
From: E*Trader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 947

Napeague Letter..the non sense..the subjective not objective News letter! First: you said the company is not reporting well, 70% of BB stocks are not reporting and we all know that. this doesn't make it a sleazy stock. many non reporting BB stock has performed very well despite this fact. Second: you said they released 5 releases in 4 weeks what is wrong with that? if they all were adding new information: changing name, acquiring web site, hiring IR firm, negotiating to acquire another internet business. what is wrong? where is your point? You didn't add a point, a logic or a reason for this stock to be sleazy like you said. Mr. Davis: with all due respect, having a web page doesn't make you a stock market expert. I would expect some in-depth analysis or reasons to your position about CMOZ. I would expect someone who is objective and not subjective like that, but your report didn't have any logic other than general attack without a valid point. versus a company that: acquired an internet business hired IR firm in the process of acquiring another 2 internet businesses