Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (34163)	2/16/1999 12:08:00 AM
From: greenspirit	Respond to of 67261

Michelle, you can live in your myopic view of what a relationship is like as long as you wish. I have read enough of your posts to see the bitterness that consumes you toward men. I noticed you didn't attempt to dispute or debate the point but elected instead to mock it. The men on this thread (even the liberal ones) will rarely disagree with that statement. It's simply the way it is with men. At least the ones with honor and integrity who don't have some hidden agenda. I sincerely hope one day you will meet someone you can trust enough to allow your bitterness to subside. Michael

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (34163)	2/16/1999 12:11:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Respond to of 67261

>Well, this is the most chauvanistic thing I have ever read on this thread! LOL Michael.< Why is this chauvinistic? A woman who trusts the character of her husband such that she makes herself vulnerable enough to stay home, proves more than a working woman (who aims to protect herself via work) that her husband has her trust. A woman here expressed the pain at having been dumped by her husband to raise her children alone. She stated that never would she again trust another man to this extent. Today she is married and works a job outside the home to try protecting herself from her current husband should he decide to make her a slave of his money. This works for her, but I would have no part of such a marriage. This woman is in effect still a slave to her former husband-- such a slave that she cannot extend to her current husband the trust she once extended to a man undeserving of it. There is a partition between she and he that simply does not exist between my wife and me. I find intimacy based on complete trust not only exhilarating, but a most superb compliment. I think this is what Michael has said, and I think he is right.