Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: antibash who wrote (19260)	2/15/1999 11:50:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 26163

So, what does this mean regarding your "arbitration hearing"???? lololololololololol In the legal sense, nothing whatsoever, I should think. Who was it who asked you recently if you had an even dim understanding of contract law? And let's see some proof of your contention. Surely you don't expect people just to believe you, considering you've never been right about anything before.

To: antibash who wrote (19260)	2/15/1999 11:53:00 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

"So, what does this mean regarding your "arbitration hearing"???? lololo..." Nothing. Wellrich doesn't really have much to do with aznt, beyond this - The letter from the arbitrator did seem to conflict with Mikey's testimony as to his presence/non presence as it was related to the thread by Spugs and yourself. Would you like to guess who i believe, between the arbitrator and Pugs? magneticdiary.com - read paragraph 24 If Mikey wasn't there, why was it that "the use of public security had to be discussed"?