SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (73718)2/16/1999 1:16:00 AM
From: Scumbria  Respond to of 186894
 
Ten,

Local politics and computer business.

A few years back Apple Computer decided to open up a large customer service center in Williamson County, Texas. Folks there were quite excited about this until somebody leaked the word that Apple provided medical benefits for "domestic partners".

Needless to say, the good people of Williamson County did not take kindly to the thought of 10,000 or so Bay area types pulling into town with their "domestic partners". (Apparently the parades in San Francisco did not leave a favorable impression on them.)

The county managers called an emergency meeting to decide whether or not to continue the tax break they had offered Apple. If my memory serves me correctly, the vote was 2 managers for, 2 managers against and one undecided.

Needless to say, the undecided manager became the object of considerable attention from the people of Round Rock and Cedar Park, Texas. Legend has it there was some rather active discussion occurring over at the manager's church that week.

To make a long story short, Governor Ann Richards dropped by to make a friendly social call to the manager in question. After a couple hours of Texas style socializing, he came out and happily announced his support for the tax break.

And the moral of the story is......

Scumbria



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (73718)2/16/1999 1:50:00 AM
From: NITT  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
wrt the so called privacy advocates--

There are lots more ways to track unsuspecting consumer then using the CPU ID in a PentiumIII. These groups like Junkbusters and EPIC have had a very hard time getting their name in the paper on Internet privacy until Intel came along. Now that Intel is here, they are going to grab on hard.

The bottom line is IT managers like this feature for asset management and tracking. Consumers will most likely leave it turned off until they want to use it as another form of authentication (not the only form) when shopping, investing, or banking online... or when someone offers an incentive to use it (discounts for example). Consumers are already being tracked while online, and the CPU ID will neither enhance this or reduce it... only more education for the users, and knowing who your visiting will reduce it.

Of course, if you want to buy any item that is not "bits" then you will need to give a shipping address and most likely a credit card (yes there is cybercash, but they still have to ship the stuff) which is a sure way to track you.

If you're embarrassed about who's going to find out about your "weird" buying habits, I suggest that you go to the bank machine and get some cash and go across town to shop where you will not be recognized. Me, I'll place my orders online and feel better about it when I can tell the merchant to look for my CPU ID in addition to my password. And for all of you who will start screaming that I am locked to one machine... I can always instruct the merchant to ask a few more authentication questions when I'm away from my own machine... it's all about making it easier and more secure for me.

So, if you support the rights of the consumer, write you congressman and tell him/her to let Intel give you another form of authentication that you control. You can also write to consumer groups, magazines and newspapers if you choose. Just don't sit back and let a small handful of people tell the world that you're too stupid to have a CPU ID feature.

Nitt