Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (34188)	2/16/1999 2:47:00 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I agree that Rush is an entertainer, and in fact I have never been much into talk radio, so my acquaintance with him is limited. I think there may be a connection between guys like Kennedy and Clinton liking to be free to run around without consequence, and their support of "women's issues". I have posted elsewhere about the relationship between easy abortion and the weakening of ties of paternity. It is very convenient for a guy who might get someone "knocked- up" to say, "hey, it's your choice, and I'll give you the money to have an abortion". It's also convenient to have women believing, as lorrie apparently does, that behaving like the worst sort of men is liberating. I consider a "radical feminist" anyone who thinks that all gender differences are "constructed", and that it is the government's responsibility to try to erase gender differences. I also consider supporters of third trimester abortions to be radical. I consider those who argue for a gynocentric paradigm in the sciences to be radical, and those who argue that the government should mandate "comparable worth" salaries to be very radical. I would not argue that all prejudice is gone, especially in business, merely that the residual is more a matter for social evolution, not government action.