Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gord Bolton who wrote (14804)	2/16/1999 8:49:00 AM
From: John Paquet	Respond to of 26850

Gord Man; Just Click the following, to save the argument. #reply-7812849 and #reply-7813813 This is still a high risk play. a risk play you put your working capitals at risk. John Paquet

To: Gord Bolton who wrote (14804)	2/16/1999 9:35:00 AM
From: mineman	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26850

The unbiased facts: (1) 3 diamonds (6, 8, & 10 carats) average value = $2,000/carat. (2) 22 diamonds between 1 and 5 carats average value = $50/carat. (3) 3 largest stones = 40 times more per carat than the next 22. (4) These figures show that either diamond values in the dyke have a population more skewed than from any other exploration bulk sample taken from almost any other dyke or pipe ever looked at in the world, or the 3 large stones did not originate from Snap Lake. (5) The way to settle this dispute is for management to allow an independent analysis by a diamond 'signature' expert to determine if the stones have a common 'unique signature' indicating they all originated from the same deposit. (6) So far management has not allowed any independent expert to examine the diamonds. These are the facts!!