To: ztect who wrote (115 ) 2/16/1999 10:40:00 PM From: Victor Lazlo Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 193
We both know that if not for the wealth and fame of OJ, this would have been an open-and-shut domestic violence case, verdict: guilty. 2). Blood everywhere? Or not ENOUGH blood everywhere?....My recollection was that there were "drops" of blood....and no bloody clothes to be found anywhere...or the murder weapon..... Yes. Blood in OJ's truck. Bloody fingerprints macthing oj's. OJ's socks up in his bedroomn were soaked in blood. << 3). What about the glove? Why no corresponding tear in the glove, that I know of, where his finger was cut? PLus why would a tight fitting glove fall off or be taken off? Must have been tight fitting right...especially since due to shrinkage or whatever....it didn't fit? >> ztect, the gloves were blood-soaked. So obviously they shrunk up with time. Try again. << 4). Marsha Clark AND Christopher Darden both SUCKED....Neither, from what I heard, had ever prosecuted a case... Who told you that? << 5). Remember Mark Furman? Now what ever happened to the charges of perjury that should have been brought against him? He weakened (severely undermined) the prosecutor's case with his blatant lies...and consequently bolstered the defense's conspiracy theories...>> Furhman (check your sp, buddy) is the only one in this whole thing who made any sense. He nailed it dead on form day one. How could the LA police "frame" oj when they did not know where the evidence would point? The cops would have had to know all the evidence prior to finding it if they were to try to frame OJ. Z, we both know that if not for the wealth and fame of OJ, this would have been an open-and-shut domestic violence case, verdict: guilty. Spare me the pious stuff about the media. OJ did it. That is a fact. Stop doing somersaults to protect a murderer. Victor