Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (19362)	2/16/1999 3:10:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 26163

i am paraphrasing but quiel's testimony was that even if the president of the united states wrote an opinion letter, the restriction on the stock doesn't change! How much does Spidey think Quiel's opinion is worth? nasdr.com Disciplinary Actions Reported For May [1998] Individuals Whose Registrations Were Revoked for Failure to Pay Fines, Costs And/Or Provide Proof Of Restitution In Connection With Violations Quiel, Robert A., Bermuda Dunes, California Schur, Peter A., San Diego, California

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (19362)	2/16/1999 3:40:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 26163

Hey! Isn't THIS interesting?!? Sec. 220.103 Borrowing of securities. (a) The Board of Governors has been asked for a ruling as to whether Sec. 220.6(h), which deals with borrowing and lending of securities, applies to a borrower of securities if the lender is a private individual, as contrasted with a member of a national securities exchange or a broker or dealer. (b) Section 220.6(h) does not require that the lender of the securities in such a case be a member of a national securities exchange or a broker or dealer. Therefore, a borrowing of securities may be able to qualify under the provision even though the lender is a private individual, and this is true whether the security is registered on a national securities exchange or is unregistered. In borrowing securities from a private individual under Sec. 220.6(h), however, it becomes especially important to bear in mind two limitations that are contained in the section. (c) The first limitation is that the section applies only if the broker borrows the securities for the purpose specified in the provision, that is, ''for the purpose of making delivery of such securities in the case of short sales, failure to receive securities he is required to deliver, or other similar cases''. The present language of the provision does not require that the delivery for which the securities are borrowed must be on a transaction which the borrower has himself made, either as agent or as principal; he may borrow under the provision in order to relend to someone else for the latter person to make such a delivery. However, the borrowing must be related to an actual delivery of the type specified--a delivery in connection with a specific transaction that has already occurred or is in immediate prospect. The provision does not authorize a broker to borrow securities (or make the related deposit) merely in order that he or some other broker may have the securities ''on hand'' or may anticipate some need that may or may not arise in the future. strategicbanker.com Well, lolololololissimo!! 480K shares, wasn't it, snicker wink?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (19362)	2/16/1999 3:50:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 26163

much of this 144 stock is back by certs from the dirty cancorde shell. this stock will never be free trading either. And why not? Mikey was selling it outta his box. We all know that.

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (19362)	2/16/1999 4:00:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 26163

the salt lake attorney issued these certs of invalid stock & regulators have been notified of this. Oh my oh my!! If this case really DOES go to trial, it's gonna be a hoot: 25 Q. So you have, what, all sorts of certificates spread out all ASSOCIATED REPORTERS OF NEVADA (702) 382-8778 106 SYLVER - CROSS 1 over the country or the world? 2 A. Do you -- can you imagine how many shares in IBM are traded 3 every day? Can you -- how many -- you know, certificates -- 4 THE COURT: Listen to the question, please, and 5 respond to the question. 6 BY MR. JUDD: 7 Q. You knew this was issued. 8 A. No. We don't know it's issued. We knew it was issued -- 9 when we get a transaction report. 10 Q. So you give shares of Amazon to all sorts of people signed. 11 A. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. A transfer agent holds all the 12 certificates. Every transfer agent in this country holds 13 facsimile signature certificates, blank. 14 The transfer agent, a neutral agent, is supposed to 15 transfer the stock for brokers, for individuals. The company 16 that relies on the transfer agent is their individual. We 17 don't -- 18 Q. Who was the transfer agent that had the original of this 19 certificate which you attached to your complaint? 20 A. A company called Fidelity Transfer. 21 Q. Who sent the original certificate with the signatures on it 22 to First Fidelity? 23 A. Attorney by a h- a gentleman by the name of Attorney 24 Leonard Burningham (phonetic) at the closing of the Amazon 25 Natural Treasures' merger with Concorde Capital on March 27th ASSOCIATED REPORTERS OF NEVADA (702) 382-8778 107 SYLVER - CROSS 1 of 1996. 2 We signed those certificates in his office, and he took 3 it -- we didn't even sign those certificates. We signed the 4 SCC document that is supposed to be signed by the president and 5 secretary of the company for the transfer agent. 6 The transfer agent then in turn took that signature and 7 placed it on the certificate as they are supposed to do by law. 8 Q. So almost two months after you signed your subscription 9 agreement with Whitecliffe and Shoreline where they were 10 supposed to pay you $1,000,000, two months later, you hadn't 11 been paid a dime according to your testimony.

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (19362)	2/17/1999 5:53:00 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Pugs, are you saying some AZNT shareholders are liars and giving false information? Happily...never came to mind during our discussion...of course, you have never expressed allegiance to the early shareholders who purchased restricted shares...you seem to isolate them and refer to them as Wellrich investors when in fact they are shareholders of AZNT. on tontos lame brain claims , aznt has affadavits from the wellrich stockholders who agreed , happily, to a 2 yr. hold. they also have affadavits from those wellrich has solicited for stock.