SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Amy J who wrote (73771)2/16/1999 4:14:00 PM
From: Michael Bakunin  Respond to of 186894
 
Intel still makes all its real money on microprocessors. If their valuation depends on new markets, I'm skeptical, since they have yet to show they can enter them at margins comparable to processors'.

Regarding AMD, I'll bring up another concern of mine: cannibalization. Compare the price-performance of a new-style Celeron with a "fast" PII or PIII; why anybody would pick the $500 or $700 part is beyond me. Bleeding edge types seem to agree so far: ars-technica.com

"Our advice: If you're thinking about buying a PIII, consider two things. First, wait until there's a reason. It's going to be a while (pessimists say never) before SSE catches on from a software standpoint, and the .18 micron process is key to the PIII moving away from the pack of wolves we've seen represented here. Second, send us some money, because if you're even thinking about buying a PIII right now after reading this, you have gotta be freaking loaded."

I think Intel has a good chance of doing very well. I simply find that the stock is priced as if their success were guaranteed. As I said, a fundamental weakness of a DDM model is that it assumes your inputs are 100% accurate. There seems to be little or no discount to the rosiest of all possible future scenarios.

Since we continue to disagree, let's check back in a few years, and see what really happened.

Cheers,

mb



To: Amy J who wrote (73771)1/15/2000 10:11:00 AM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Amy,>>>My suggestion: get in now, before Merced ships. When Intel's stock moves, it tends to move quickly. "200 in 2000" are nice even numbers and the phrase sounds lovely. <<<

Even Abbey Cohen could not have phrased it better. Truly a terrific call.

Mary



To: Amy J who wrote (73771)1/16/2000 2:42:00 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Amy,

- AMD meltdown

AMD appears hot, but I do not see any indication of melting.

Do you really think that Merced is going to make a big splash? I don't see that happening in the short term.

Scumbria