SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (34237)2/16/1999 5:33:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
We've just seen that sexual excess, perjury and even obstruction of justice do not offend the voters, so why should Bush have anything to fear? JLA



To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (34237)2/16/1999 6:03:00 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
<<Most people involved in the poll of Gore vs. Bush Jr. don't know much about his past. Gore actually is the more moral of the two from a historical standpoint.>>

This is the most interesting part of the current phenomena. I fully believe that the small end of the egg people could run this campaign and win. Ironically the reverse clinton arguement. As they did with the clinton "pshaw it doesn't count because its just his personal life. Nothing to do with his leadership."



To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (34237)2/16/1999 9:46:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
If you logic holds, then Hillary would certainly be toast in NY. Commodities bribes, Palestinian state, Castle Grande, billing records, travel office, etc.



To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (34237)2/17/1999 12:51:00 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Could be, and I know better than to place bets based on polls this far from an election. My only point was that the backlash is not in evidence in such numbers...