Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CDCH Cerro Dorado Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Bishop who wrote (351)	2/16/1999 5:55:00 PM
From: Daniel Miller	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 958

Oh I never saw that. Pretty interesting... But he is right if they are unknown nobody will buy from them. Guess what, they are unknown.

To: Jim Bishop who wrote (351)	2/16/1999 10:12:00 PM
From: Cytotekk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 958

Well, sounds like WAMC thinks that the low share price is all john's fault. Recently, one of our investor relations people was contacted and presented with questions concerning the Company and it's operating status. Unfortunately, the answers were misinterpreted and subsequently posted on an internet investor chat forum. The posted misinformation created a poor picture of the Company, frightened more than a few, and resulted in unwarranted selling. They sure did not mention prior management dumping shares which brought the price suddenly down to .15. "In fighting", as I recall. Actually it sounds more like a jump ship and dump shares by the prior President. The price was .15 BEFORE john got the information from Earl that he posted. If .15 does not cut it then they were in trouble well before john called to get investor information from Earl. Gee, john sure is powerful. That share price has nothing to do with all the negative's of this company including that they have no orders and the plant is not operating at the moment...oh yeah, and the phone has been cut off. I don't think I like that letter very much. At least they were honest about needing $100,000+ to get going again. I almost thought they were going to give out john's phone number so he could give out testimonials. These guys need to line up financing and get to marketing. If the product is so well regarded and people worldwide acknowledge their product's superiority they should be able to find a backer. Colleen in Orlando.

To: Jim Bishop who wrote (351)	2/16/1999 10:25:00 PM
From: robert b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 958

companies normally don't post on chat lines and it is highly recommended in the industry that they don't !!! anyway ... tons of postings are done daily on SI which is perfect, some good and some bad . it used to be that you had basically two sources of information, a promoter or broker and/or the company (unless you wanted to pay big bucks for independent analysis) so that information was pretty biased. now you have feedback from many angles. here we have one guys opinion and the shares shoot down ... we see this everyday ... we also see that then the people do their own due diligence, see that it was probably a hoax, an enemy or a short seller who commented and that the info was false, then resulting in the shares to go back up. so if people do believe that what was said was misinterpreted after their research, then by now the shares should have risen somewhat, but ... in other words, if they do have the greatest sealers, dozens of superior products, 4 great contracts in the workings, a plant ready to produce, then one guys opinion shouldn't have affected the stocks price FOR THE LONG RUN, but it did ...