Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Xenolix Technologies (XTCI) 'Ecstasy'(Formerly MGAU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan P who wrote (2789)	2/16/1999 10:46:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5143

<<..results are very encouraging, we need to get some specific numbers as far as the economy of the methodology..>> I have tried to back calculcate the ratios of head ore to concentrates and find that I use the current news release info and get 7% on one method and 4.25 % on another. As if it matters. Anyone but me try the decimal of all mother of newmath? TIA Chuca P.S.- 35 pounds to 500 pounds in line one= The 7 %, 1.034 OPT back from that in grams to OPT reduced by the ratio to find a different contration ratio of 4.25 % in the Second Paragraph. Relating the 10 pounds back from the weight needed to get one OPT at the 3 grams ( I like 3 gram sample folks- remember the 5 gallon container!) Voila...easy...I think. So is it 14 to one or 23 to one. Or does it matter. BECAUSE if the ten pounds came from a SAME batch as implied as the 35 pounds all things will differ in my assumptions. Who cares, tomorrow let's watch her ride! P.P.S.- SFA is out of step but this is possibilty not. Sinagua Ore had been assayed befor, as per the Histogram. They know where the ore came from. Based upon the Histo...the sample is from the Rich Stuff. Watch us find out it was from moderate sections!