SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : SATH - Shop At Home -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Batgirl who wrote (1077)2/16/1999 9:36:00 PM
From: Razorbak  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1329
 
Girl, you crack me up. Your track record compared to Tony's is toast on this stock, but does that affect your attitude in any way? No! You look like Brer Rabbit all tied up in the tar baby, and yet you still keep swingin'. Ain't you got no sense a'tall???

Razor



To: Batgirl who wrote (1077)2/16/1999 9:45:00 PM
From: Anthony@Pacific  Respond to of 1329
 
Bat I have posted each and every trade...if you really cared ..you would know that ..please dont make any untrue statements ..

Its not a good idea just ask around



To: Batgirl who wrote (1077)2/17/1999 12:12:00 AM
From: Amit Ghate  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1329
 
>How come you stopped posting them all on SI Real time for legitimacy like you did before ..There is no proof .<

What are you talking about? Do you think people can be confused so easily, when all they have to do is bookmark A@P's profile or his threads? With this type of statement you've lost whatever modicum of credibility you might have had.

Amit



To: Batgirl who wrote (1077)2/17/1999 12:37:00 AM
From: Never Hibernate  Respond to of 1329
 
I thought I explained this - we short in tranches to avoid bad timing - there is more to life than looking at charts - how about the blatantly obvious fact that there would be no buyers left after the "news" with that 800 Lb gorilla - would you buy after that? No - I bet you were getting ready to sell like everyone else on this board, but now you are stuck holding the hot potato. Think about the psychology of this trade - tunnel vision with TA got you no where. Also, the first tranche was done at 23 3/4 just in case it would go down from there - if we claimed we knew where the top was, then it would have been a 100% position, right? This is just basic dollar cost averaging - a good startegy in general. We knew the top was within two days of that trade though, so there was little to worry about.

-NH



To: Batgirl who wrote (1077)2/17/1999 12:38:00 AM
From: Never Hibernate  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1329
 
Oh yeah - and was that first short @ 23 3/4 a losing trade?? I don't think so - I am sure you see the current price!! So do not claim Anthony et al made losing trades.

-NH