SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ahhaha who wrote (5456)2/17/1999 1:25:00 AM
From: marcher  Respond to of 29970
 
ahhaha, nice to have you back. Your voice has been missed. I don't have a position in athm, yet. Looking for an entry point...not in any rush.

best of luck

--Marc



To: ahhaha who wrote (5456)2/17/1999 1:27:00 AM
From: E. Davies  Respond to of 29970
 
Ahhaha,
I thought you were better than childish sarcasm.
Eric



To: ahhaha who wrote (5456)2/17/1999 1:31:00 AM
From: Jing Qian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29970
 
Bell South just announced to team up with 3COM to offer ADSL.
My feeling is that a pie is divided by @Home and the rest of the RBOCs. @Home takes at least 50% of the broadband pie. RBOCs take the remaining 50%. However, there are several RBOCs, Bell Atlantic, Bell South, SBC, US West and etc. They are all fighting the
non-cable portion. But none of them can touch the cable portion. These RBOCs will compete with each other and exhaust their energy
and resources. But @Home is a much better position due to its near monopoly stance. While RBOCs fight with each other for a smaller pie, and exhaust themselves, @Home will grow steadily to success.
The only way for RBOCs to beat T/ATHM is to partner among themselves and partner with a stronger content provider like AOL.
But I don't see that is happening. So far AOL only established a partnership with Bell Atlantic. On the ADSL front, it's a mess with no strength.

Tonight King country just approved the transfer of licence to T. A great news for T and ATHM. The fundamental keeps looking better.
All others are noise, such as the DELL scare.



To: ahhaha who wrote (5456)2/17/1999 2:44:00 AM
From: David Harker  Respond to of 29970
 
Sounds like your reply to Dave Horne was meant for me, I posted
M. Dell's quote about ATHM a while ago. Different last names.
That's ok, fire away, what do you care.

Sure, ATHM may suffer in the very short term as the tech sector
may 'tank' on the "dell setback" or the "dell disaster", whatever
term you like... but who cares, if a long term holder?

Regarding my earlier posting of Dell's comment on ATHM - the analysts
are the lemmings, and for them to hear M. Dell praise ATHM gets
more positive press for ATHM, that's all. No, that doesn't help
ATHM a bit in the long term, only their performance as a company
will determine that.

M. Dell can, and has been, wrong. The stock does well in the long
term in spite of that - the company is well managed vs. their
competition. Seems to me you wrote:
"Holding DELL indefinitely is a good idea."
in post:
exchange2000.com

but then you remembered that and were just playing one of your
little games, weren't you? :-)