Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Street who wrote (28465)	2/17/1999 8:37:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116764

Right on the money! Street, Absolutely!! And you forgot to add "statist", government "hack", and making personal attacks accusing someone of having an agenda against a particular issue, instead of debating that person's logic. I would suggest that referring to me as "james carville" or suggesting that I'm a Federal worker somehow paid to denounce gold are just as irrelevant as the references you refer to. It also would irrelevant to accuse someone of being a free-lance reporter merely interested in writing a derogatory story on goldbugs. And as I seem to remember, I did not begin the personal bashing. It was others who chose those tactics when they were unable or unwilling to defeat the logic of the argument. I really want to avoid the name calling. It is beneath each of us (I hope..:0), and adds nothing to an objective discussion of the precious metals and a potential bottom in it. We all want to make money and none of us have the "juice" to individually impact the gold market with our opinions. So why don't we set aside the "airs" and the preconceived biases and analyze the market based upon observable indicators and comparisons. Regards, Ron