Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Sound Works (SOWK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ColinD who wrote (245)	2/17/1999 8:43:00 AM
From: im a survivor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 582

OK Colin... Time to put your reputation where your mouth is... you claim, and I quote " you have used this 13 year old boy concept on me before, so I take it you are referring to me in your post " I suggest you go back and proove this. That is a flat out lie. Go ahead, copy and paste whatever you are talking about,. You either have me confused with someone else, or your in dream land or something. And it is very nice of you to stretch around what people say, to fit whatever need you have. People make quotes and you misconstrue them to where they have different meaning. I quoted....100 people could think something is great and 1 - 13 year old on dads comp could say it's a scam, and thats enough to case doubt. So, most people reading this quote would infer it to mean that if any one person says it's a scam, that would be enough to cause some doubt in a persons mind. Thats it. Period. You infer that THIS PARTICULAR STOCK may have serious problems because of that. Why this stock and not others ?? I was making a very generalized comment about anybody saying any stock is a scam will raise doubts in some people, yet you infer THAT THIS COMPANY is in trouble if thats the case. Just another way for you to rag on SOWK in a roundabout way, but any smart person will see right thru you. Lastly, I really would love to see where I have " used this 13 year old boy on dads computer " with you. It never happend and I never referred to you that way. But for the simple reason that you did think I referred to you that way, and that I MUST be referring to you, says an awful lot. If you weren't guilty, why would you think it was you I was referring to in my last post. The funny thing is I just made a generalized comment about anybody with a comp can cause doubt with a single post, it was not intended for any individual on this thread...just a generalized comment about the power of persuasion...yet you immdediately think I am referring to you. Hmmm, very interesting.