SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Strategy for Achieving Wealth and Off Topic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Eliz2 who wrote (22794)2/17/1999 9:20:00 AM
From: billwot  Respond to of 27012
 
Eliz-Whether you buy pre-spilt or post-split, you wind up with the same number of shares for the same amount of money invested. In fact, because of the false perception that splits somehow reduce price, shares often run up immediately after a split, which of course increases your basis cost.

I am always eager to see a split in stocks I own because of that, but it doesn't help me get into one that I follow but don't own. Restated, the effect of a split is often to drive prices up, which is good for current holders, but bad for new prospective investors.

billwot



To: Eliz2 who wrote (22794)2/18/1999 12:33:00 AM
From: David M Gambs  Respond to of 27012
 
Eliz2,

You have $8000 to invest.
Dell at 80 = 100 shares.
Dell splits. You have 200 shares.

If you purchase post split:
Dell at 40 = 200 shares.

As others will point out, quite often the price runs up post split. It quite often stays there. To have a good stock go down into a split means you should probably buy before the split and run up.

I bought Dell 1 September 98 - before the 2:1 split then scheduled. It ran up. I sold 75% in January (I was on margin for this). After this split, I will have the same number of shares I originally purchased with a basis 25% of the original. Not bad :)

Regards,
dmg

(Go INTeL Go to $200 - ([post all splits: past, present & future])