Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (31048)	2/19/1999 1:10:00 AM
From: nihil	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

I never doubted that women were attracted to handsome cut males for sexual gratification and to be squired around by -- its just that it seems strange to me for women to get their news from such. I know I prefer from news from sexy ladies, but I don't take financial advice from Maria Bartiroma or any other cutie. Do you actually accept a news analysis from a guy who's "cute", how about some weightlifting stud? Or Back Street Boy, or Football Ruffian. As Freud said: What do women want? It seems a terrible waste to insist that newsmen be cute, or newswomen for that matter. Pretty people, it seems to me, to be efficiently allocated, should concentrate on being sexual objects - -who get better paid than newsmen any way. Computer objects can be much cuter by far than living imperfect human beings. Thge time will come I swear, when robots will read the news much clearer, faster, and far more sexily than a living creature. Many women now prefer a vibrator to an ordinary male, and a robot, cinebot, or cybord will soon replace the overly expensive pretty boys you women seem to want to keep on tap. The real question is whether the cyber dudes will replace men in the sack. What do you think?