Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Xenolix Technologies (XTCI) 'Ecstasy'(Formerly MGAU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Char who wrote (2817)	2/17/1999 12:09:00 PM
From: Larry Macklin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5143

char, have those results been made public? Have they been verified by some referee labs? How about by a third party engineering firm? Larry

To: Char who wrote (2817)	2/17/1999 12:17:00 PM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5143

Char, all I'm saying is that if the history which I have relayed to you(sweetheart deals, hand picked consultants finding nothing, and a history of promises with no proof) means less than their explanation of a lack of trust and the process works better on this property, then God bless. However, keep in mind that those explanations are non sensical in the following way. A third party consultant of your choosing doesn't care if they dont trust naxos, they just report results, and J/L said the process works on 80% of the worlds surface and naxos property. that later turned out to not be true. Given the history of the dirts, aren't those red flags big enough to cause at least some level of concern for you? Mark BTW, I know you don't me, but you can ask chuca if I am a short, or if I would lie to you. I may be wrong, but it won't be because I am lying.