Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Cat who wrote (911)	2/17/1999 12:28:00 PM
From: Brumell	Respond to of 5821

I really agree with you, Tomcat. There is a very big difference. Firstly, when the trading patterns are compared, NWI has continued upward from the initial spike over the last 2 weeks or so. CRN peaked on it's first spike and gradually deteriorated even after financing. Secondly, CRN did not spark a staking rush like NWI although much of the close-in ground had long been held. Donner, of course, was a "close in" play following on the successes of Voisey Bay. There were no specific events such as cores pulled, etc, to justify the interest in their play. The best comparable for market action I can remember is Afton Copper which goes back to about 1974. Timing and nature of trading and drilling was very similar as was the nature and type of close-in staking. The overall junior market was also comparable to today's market. Geology and location of course were different - one being in B.C., the other in Mattagami. Regards, Bob